Revenge Porn Laws in Illinois

Illinois makes non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images a crime: intentionally sharing an image of an identifiable person engaged in a sexual act or with intimate parts exposed, when the image was obtained under circumstances where it was to remain private and the sharer knew or should have known the person did not consent. It is a Class 4 felony (1 to 3 years), with forfeiture, and there are exceptions for criminal investigations, reporting unlawful conduct, voluntary public or commercial exposure and lawful public purposes. Victims can also sue under the Civil Remedies for Nonconsensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images Act, which covers intentional sharing or threatened sharing of private or intentionally digitally altered sexual images by a person over 18.

Illinois's rule on court-appointed lawyers: Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 401(a), an indigent defendant has the right to appointed counsel whenever the charge is punishable by imprisonment. The trial judge appoints the county Office of the Public Defender, which assigns the individual assistant public defender. Whether a person is indigent is left to the trial court's discretion based on as complete a financial picture as possible; a person need not be entirely without funds to be found indigent, and a court may not refuse appointment solely because the defendant posted bail. The Office of the State Appellate Defender handles appeals for indigent defendants. Ill. S. Ct. R. 401(a); People v. Campbell, 224 Ill. 2d 80 (2007); Burnette v. Terrell, 232 Ill. 2d 522 (2009); People v. Ellis, 309 Ill. App. 3d 443 (1999); People ex rel. Baker v. Power, 60 Ill. 2d 151 (1975)

Lawyers set their own fees, and Illinois has rules on how they may charge. See hiring a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois for fee rules, how to check a lawyer's license and free help.

How release before trial works in Illinois: Illinois abolished cash (monetary) bail under the Pretrial Fairness Act (part of the SAFE-T Act); cash bail ended in Illinois courts on September 18, 2023, after the Illinois Supreme Court upheld the law in Rowe v. Raoul, 2023 IL 129248. The default is pretrial release on personal recognizance, with conditions. The State may seek detention only in specified cases by filing a petition; at the first detention hearing the State must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant committed a detainable offense, that the defendant poses a real and present threat to any person or the community or a high likelihood of willful flight, and that no conditions could mitigate that threat or risk. The court must revisit continued detention at later hearings. 725 ILCS 5/110-6.1 (P.A. 101-652, 102-1104); Rowe v. Raoul, 2023 IL 129248 What happens after an arrest.

Each state sets its own rules for sealing or expunging records. See Illinois expungement and record sealing rules.