Non-Compete Agreements in District of Columbia
How District of Columbia law treats non-compete agreements, with the statute or official source.
Short answer: Banned for most workers. Since October 1, 2022, employers may not require or ask a covered employee to sign a non-compete, and such provisions are void. D.C. Code §§ 32-581.01, 32-581.02
| Non-compete agreements | Banned for most workers. Since October 1, 2022, employers may not require or ask a covered employee to sign a non-compete, and such provisions are void. The ban does not apply to highly compensated employees (those earning at least a yearly threshold that started at $150,000 and is adjusted for inflation); separate rules apply to them. Retaliation for refusing or asking about a non-compete is illegal. Re-verified 2026-10-27. |
|---|
Where to get help in District of Columbia
More District of Columbia employment law
- Minimum Wage in District of Columbia
- Final Paycheck Laws in District of Columbia
- Meal and Rest Break Laws in District of Columbia
- Wrongful Termination in District of Columbia
- Paid Sick Leave in District of Columbia
- All District of Columbia employment law rules
FAQ
Are non-compete agreements enforceable in District of Columbia?
Banned for most workers. Since October 1, 2022, employers may not require or ask a covered employee to sign a non-compete, and such provisions are void. The ban does not apply to highly compensated employees (those earning at least a yearly threshold that started at $150,000 and is adjusted for inflation); separate rules apply to them. Retaliation for refusing or asking about a non-compete is illegal.
General legal information, not legal advice. Laws change and local rules can differ; check the linked official source or talk to a lawyer about your situation.