Arizona Section 8, Records & Right to Counsel
Arizona rules on section 8, records & right to counsel for renters and landlords, with the statute or official page behind each answer. Last verified: 2026-10-22.
Short answer: No. Arizona has no statewide ban on source-of-income discrimination. The state fair housing act protects race, color, religion, sex, familial status, and national origin (and disability under separate sections), but not source of income or voucher use. A.R.S. § 41-1491.14
The rules in Arizona
| Statewide ban on refusing Section 8 / source of income | No. Arizona has no statewide ban on source-of-income discrimination. The state fair housing act protects race, color, religion, sex, familial status, and national origin (and disability under separate sections), but not source of income or voucher use. Some cities (e.g., Phoenix, Tucson) have local source-of-income ordinances. Re-verified 2026-10-27. Source: A.R.S. § 41-1491.14 |
|---|---|
| Eviction record sealing | Yes, but only in limited cases. The court must seal all records of an eviction case (special detainer, forcible entry and detainer, or summary eviction) when it dismisses the case before judgment or enters judgment for the tenant. It must also seal the case when the landlord and tenant file a written stipulation to set aside the eviction order and seal the file. Sealed records are available only to the tenant, parties and attorneys who appeared, the court, and the clerk. They may not be sold or released in bulk or individual transfers to third parties. Judgments for the landlord are not sealed unless both parties stipulate. The statute reads as automatic on dismissal or a tenant judgment. Some justice courts direct parties to file a motion to set aside and seal. Re-verified 2026-10-27. |
| Right to a lawyer in eviction | No statewide right to counsel in eviction cases. No Arizona statute gives tenants an appointed lawyer in special detainer or forcible detainer actions. Section lists for both chapters were checked, and none provides counsel. Re-verified 2026-10-27. |
Related questions
- Can a landlord refuse Section 8?
- Can an eviction be removed from your record?
- Do tenants get a free lawyer for an eviction?
Arizona vs. neighboring states
| State | Statewide ban on refusing Section 8 / source of income | Eviction record sealing | Right to a lawyer in eviction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | No. Arizona has no statewide ban on source-of-income discrimination. The state fair housing act protects race, color, religion, sex, familial status, and national origin (and disability under separate sections), but not source of income or voucher use. A.R.S. § 41-1491.14 | Yes, but only in limited cases. The court must seal all records of an eviction case (special detainer, forcible entry and detainer, or summary eviction) when it dismisses the case before judgment or enters judgment for the tenant. It must also seal the case when the landlord and tenant file a written stipulation to set aside the eviction order and seal the file. Sealed records are available only to the tenant, parties and attorneys who appeared, the court, and the clerk. They may not be sold or released in bulk or individual transfers to third parties. Judgments for the landlord are not sealed unless both parties stipulate. A.R.S. § 33-1379 (Laws 2022, ch. 286, HB 2485) | No statewide right to counsel in eviction cases. No Arizona statute gives tenants an appointed lawyer in special detainer or forcible detainer actions. A.R.S. Title 33, Ch. 10 (§§ 33-1301 to 33-1381); A.R.S. Title 12, Ch. 8, Art. 4 (§§ 12-1171 to 12-1183) checked |
| California | Yes. Statewide, owners may not discriminate in housing because of source of income, or advertise a preference based on it. Source of income means lawful, verifiable income paid to the tenant or a representative, or paid to the landlord for the tenant. It includes federal, state, and local public assistance and housing subsidies, including Section 8 vouchers. HUD-VASH vouchers are expressly included. When there is a government rent subsidy, the owner may not apply income standards to the full rent rather than the tenant's share. Since January 1, 2024 (SB 267), the owner also may not use credit history without offering the applicant the option to show ability to pay the tenant's share with alternative evidence (such as benefit records, pay records, or bank statements), and must reasonably consider that evidence. Cal. Gov. Code §§ 12955(a), (c), (o) (as amended by SB 267, Stats. 2023, ch. 776); 12927(i) | Masking is automatic and statutory. For the first 60 days after an unlawful detainer case is filed, the court file is open only to the parties and their attorneys, to anyone who gives the clerk the name of a plaintiff, the name of a defendant, and the unit address, to residents of the premises, and to anyone with a court order for good cause. After that, the record becomes public only if the landlord wins a judgment against all defendants: either within 60 days of filing, or after a trial held more than 60 days after filing. If the tenant wins, or the case is dismissed or settled without a landlord judgment, the record stays masked. Nonpayment cases filed between March 4, 2020 and September 30, 2021 stay masked. Post-foreclosure cases under CCP 1161a become public only after a trial judgment. The parties may also agree by stipulation that the court bar access to the record. There is no separate statutory expungement procedure. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1161.2(a) (as amended by AB 2304, Stats. 2024, ch. 711) | No statewide right to counsel in eviction cases. The Sargent Shriver Civil Counsel Act funds Judicial Council grant programs in selected courts that appoint counsel for low-income parties in housing and other civil matters, subject to funding. Some cities have their own right-to-counsel ordinances. Cal. Gov. Code §§ 68650-68651 |
| Nevada | No. Nevada's fair housing statute covers race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry, familial status and sex, but not source of income or housing vouchers. NRS 118.100 | Yes, automatic in some cases and by motion in others. Summary-eviction court files are sealed automatically when the case is dismissed; 10 judicial days after the court denies the eviction; or 31 days after the tenant files a contest affidavit if the landlord does not file a complaint within 30 days. Files from evictions granted during the COVID-19 emergency (Mar. 12, 2020 - May 20, 2022) were sealed automatically. The court may also seal a file on the parties' written stipulation, or on the tenant's motion if the eviction should be set aside under JCRCP 60 or sealing is in the interests of justice (considering circumstances beyond the tenant's control, other extenuating circumstances, and time elapsed). A sealed case is treated as never having occurred. Notices to surrender may not be made publicly available unless filed in an unsealed case. NRS 40.2545 | No statewide statutory right to counsel in eviction cases found. NRS Ch. 40 and 118A (no counsel provision) |
| Utah | Yes. The Utah Fair Housing Act prohibits refusing to rent, discriminating in terms, and discriminatory advertising or application forms because of source of income, defined as the verifiable condition of receiving federal, state, or local assistance or being a tenant receiving government subsidies, including rental assistance or rent supplements. The state act preempts local housing-discrimination ordinances. Utah Code 57-21-5(1); 57-21-2 (definition); 57-21-2.5 | Yes. Automatic: without a petition, the court must expunge all records of an eviction filed on or after July 1, 2022 if the entire case was dismissed, no appeal is pending, and at least 3 years have passed since filing, or if the parties filed a stipulation to expunge. By petition: any party may petition to expunge a holdover or nonpayment eviction once any judgment is satisfied; the court must expunge if no written objection is filed within 60 days (an objection blocks expungement). Courts publish a list of expunged evictions; agencies and tenant screening companies must remove them within 30 days, and the eviction is treated as never having occurred. Utah Code 78B-6-850 to 78B-6-854 | Not verified yet |
| New Mexico | No statewide protection. 2025 HB 339, which would have added 'source of income' as a protected category for housing under the Human Rights Act, died. A similar 2024 bill (HB 25) was reported as failing in committee. NMSA 1978, § 28-1-7 (no source-of-income category); 2025 HB 339 (died) | No eviction-specific sealing statute. 2025 HB 253, which would have sealed eviction records when a case is filed and unsealed them only after a judgment for the owner, died. 2025 HB 253 (died) | Not verified yet |
| Colorado | Yes. Colorado's fair housing law bars refusing to rent, setting different terms, using discriminatory ads, or falsely saying a unit is unavailable because of a person's source of income. Source of income means any lawful, verifiable source of money, including wages and any government or private assistance, grant, or loan program such as housing vouchers. Landlords may still check credit if they check every applicant. Exemptions: landlords with three or fewer rental units are exempt from the source-of-income provisions. A landlord with five or fewer single-family rental homes (and no more than five total units) need not accept federal housing choice vouchers for those homes. Applying the income-screening limits in § 38-12-904(1)(c)-(d) is also a source-of-income violation. Since May 29, 2025, it is also an unfair housing practice for a landlord to fail to make reasonable efforts to respond on time to requests for information and documents needed for a tenant's rental-assistance application, or to fail to cooperate in good faith with a tenant applying for rental assistance. If a court finds discrimination based on a tenant's use of a housing subsidy, it must award at least $5,000 in damages, and actual damages must account for a subsidy the tenant lost because of the discrimination. C.R.S. §§ 24-34-501(4.5), 24-34-502(1)(l)-(q), (1.5), (1.7); § 24-34-502(1)(r), § 24-34-505.6(6)(a), (8) (added by HB 25-1240) | Yes, automatic suppression. Every eviction (forcible entry and detainer) court record is suppressed from the moment the case is filed. The parties, their attorneys, judges, court staff, and people with a court order can see it, and courts may not publish party names online. The record becomes public only if the court enters an order granting the landlord possession, unless both parties agree to keep it suppressed. Cases that are dismissed, settled, or won by the tenant stay suppressed. Since August 6, 2025, a defendant who is a victim-survivor of domestic violence, domestic abuse, stalking, or unlawful sexual behavior may move to suppress, or keep suppressed, any eviction record, including a judgment for possession and records predating the law. The court must grant the motion if the tenant provides qualifying documentation and states that public access risks the safety of the tenant or a household member. C.R.S. § 13-40-110.5 (subsection (3) as amended by HB 25-1168) | No statewide right to a lawyer in eviction cases. The state funds eviction legal help through the Eviction Legal Defense Fund. The state court administrator makes grants to qualifying nonprofit legal aid organizations to advise and represent indigent tenants (income at or below 200% of the federal poverty guidelines) facing eviction, but this is not a guaranteed right to counsel. C.R.S. § 13-40-127 |
City rules that may add to state law
More Arizona rental law
- Arizona Security Deposit Law
- Arizona Eviction Laws
- Arizona Notice to Vacate Rules
- Landlord Entry Rules in Arizona
- Arizona Repairs & Tenant Remedies
- Arizona Rent Increase & Late Fee Laws
- Breaking a Lease in Arizona
- Squatters' Rights in Arizona
- Arizona Rental Fee Rules
- Arizona Mold, Pests, Heat & AC Rules
- Arizona Privacy, Guests & Animal Rules
- Arizona Landlord Selling the House
- Arizona Lockouts, Utility Shutoffs & Retaliation
- Arizona Subletting, Lease Endings & Tenant Death
- All Arizona landlord-tenant rules
- Free legal help in Arizona
Compare section 8, records & right to counsel in all 50 states and DC →
Arizona Section 8, Records & Right to Counsel FAQ
Is it illegal for a landlord to refuse Section 8 vouchers in Arizona?
No. Arizona has no statewide ban on source-of-income discrimination. The state fair housing act protects race, color, religion, sex, familial status, and national origin (and disability under separate sections), but not source of income or voucher use. (A.R.S. § 41-1491.14)
Can an eviction record be sealed or removed in Arizona?
Yes, but only in limited cases. The court must seal all records of an eviction case (special detainer, forcible entry and detainer, or summary eviction) when it dismisses the case before judgment or enters judgment for the tenant. It must also seal the case when the landlord and tenant file a written stipulation to set aside the eviction order and seal the file. Sealed records are available only to the tenant, parties and attorneys who appeared, the court, and the clerk. They may not be sold or released in bulk or individual transfers to third parties. Judgments for the landlord are not sealed unless both parties stipulate. (A.R.S. § 33-1379 (Laws 2022, ch. 286, HB 2485))
Do tenants have a right to a free lawyer in eviction cases in Arizona?
No statewide right to counsel in eviction cases. No Arizona statute gives tenants an appointed lawyer in special detainer or forcible detainer actions. (A.R.S. Title 33, Ch. 10 (§§ 33-1301 to 33-1381); A.R.S. Title 12, Ch. 8, Art. 4 (§§ 12-1171 to 12-1183) checked)
General legal information, not legal advice. Laws change and local rules can differ; check the linked official source or talk to a lawyer about your situation.