Arizona Lockouts, Utility Shutoffs & Retaliation
Arizona rules on lockouts, utility shutoffs & retaliation for renters and landlords, with the statute or official page behind each answer. Last verified: 2026-10-22.
Short answer: A landlord may not recover or take possession of a rental by action or otherwise, including by willfully cutting essential services, except after abandonment or surrender or as the landlord-tenant act permits. A.R.S. §§ 33-1374, 33-1367
The rules in Arizona
| Lockouts and illegal eviction | A landlord may not recover or take possession of a rental by action or otherwise, including by willfully cutting essential services, except after abandonment or surrender or as the landlord-tenant act permits. If a landlord unlawfully removes or excludes the tenant, the tenant may recover possession or end the lease and, either way, recover the greater of two months' periodic rent or twice actual damages. If the lease ends, the landlord must return the security the tenant is owed. Source: A.R.S. §§ 33-1374, 33-1367 |
|---|---|
| Landlord shutting off utilities | A landlord may not take back a rental by willfully cutting off electricity, gas, water or other essential services, and may not terminate utilities provided under the lease except for repairs or as the act allows. If the landlord willfully cuts services, the tenant may recover possession or end the lease and recover the greater of two months' periodic rent or twice actual damages. If the landlord deliberately or negligently fails to supply heat, cooling, water, hot water or essential services, after reasonable notice the tenant may buy the service and deduct the reasonable cost from rent, recover damages for reduced rental value, or get reasonable substitute housing and not pay rent for that period. A landlord who wrongly terminates lease-provided utilities can also owe damages, costs, reasonable attorney fees and face an injunction (§ 33-1364(D)). |
| Landlord retaliation | A landlord may not raise rent, decrease services, or bring or threaten an eviction after the tenant (1) complained to a building or housing code agency about a health or safety violation, (2) complained to the landlord about a § 33-1324 maintenance violation, (3) organized or joined a tenants' union, or (4) complained to a wage-price stabilization agency. A complaint within 6 months before the alleged retaliation creates a presumption of retaliation. The presumption does not arise if the complaint was made after notice of termination. The landlord may still evict for unpaid rent or for code violations the tenant caused. Remedies are under § 33-1367. Re-verified 2026-10-27. Source: A.R.S. § 33-1381 |
Related questions
Arizona vs. neighboring states
| State | Lockouts and illegal eviction | Landlord shutting off utilities | Landlord retaliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | A landlord may not recover or take possession of a rental by action or otherwise, including by willfully cutting essential services, except after abandonment or surrender or as the landlord-tenant act permits. If a landlord unlawfully removes or excludes the tenant, the tenant may recover possession or end the lease and, either way, recover the greater of two months' periodic rent or twice actual damages. If the lease ends, the landlord must return the security the tenant is owed. A.R.S. §§ 33-1374, 33-1367 | A landlord may not take back a rental by willfully cutting off electricity, gas, water or other essential services, and may not terminate utilities provided under the lease except for repairs or as the act allows. If the landlord willfully cuts services, the tenant may recover possession or end the lease and recover the greater of two months' periodic rent or twice actual damages. If the landlord deliberately or negligently fails to supply heat, cooling, water, hot water or essential services, after reasonable notice the tenant may buy the service and deduct the reasonable cost from rent, recover damages for reduced rental value, or get reasonable substitute housing and not pay rent for that period. A.R.S. §§ 33-1374, 33-1367, 33-1364 | A landlord may not raise rent, decrease services, or bring or threaten an eviction after the tenant (1) complained to a building or housing code agency about a health or safety violation, (2) complained to the landlord about a § 33-1324 maintenance violation, (3) organized or joined a tenants' union, or (4) complained to a wage-price stabilization agency. A complaint within 6 months before the alleged retaliation creates a presumption of retaliation. A.R.S. § 33-1381 |
| California | Lockouts and other self-help evictions are illegal. The landlord must go to court and may not physically remove or lock out the tenant, remove outside doors or windows, or take the tenant's belongings to carry out an eviction. A landlord who does so may be liable for the tenant's actual damages plus penalties of up to $100 per day for the time the unlawful methods were used. Cal. Dept. of Real Estate, California Tenants: A Guide to Residential Tenants' and Landlords' Rights and Responsibilities (2026 ed.) | A landlord must use the court eviction process and may not use self-help to force a tenant out, such as cutting off water, gas or electricity. A landlord who uses unlawful methods may be liable for the tenant's actual damages (such as hotel and meal costs) plus penalties of up to $100 per day for the time the unlawful methods were used. Cal. Dept. of Real Estate, California Tenants: A Guide to Residential Tenants' and Landlords' Rights and Responsibilities (2026 ed.) | A landlord may not evict, raise rent, or reduce services within 180 days after the tenant, in good faith, gives a repair notice under § 1942, reports a suspected bed bug infestation, complains about habitability, complains to a housing agency, or takes part in a related inspection, lawsuit, or arbitration. This applies only if the tenant is not behind on rent, and a tenant may invoke it once per 12 months. Retaliation for organizing or joining a tenants' association, or for exercising other legal rights, is also unlawful. Threatening to report a tenant to immigration authorities counts as retaliation. Cal. Civ. Code § 1942.5 |
| Nevada | Self-help eviction is banned. A landlord may take possession only through a court action, after the tenant surrenders the unit, or after the tenant abandons it as defined by statute. If the landlord unlawfully removes or locks out the tenant, the tenant may file a verified complaint for expedited relief within 5 judicial days, and the court must hold a hearing within 3 judicial days of filing. The tenant may recover possession or end the agreement and recover actual damages, up to $2,500 set by the court, or both. NRS 118A.480, 118A.390 | No. If a landlord willfully interrupts, or causes or permits the interruption of, an essential item or service, the tenant may seek immediate possession through an expedited court complaint, use the essential-services remedies, or end the rental agreement, and may recover actual damages, an amount up to $2,500 set by the court, or both. In setting the award the court considers the landlord's good faith, the parties' course of dealing, and the harm to the tenant. NRS 118A.390, 118A.380 | Landlord may not terminate/refuse to renew, raise rent, decrease essential services, or bring or threaten a possession action because the tenant in good faith complained of building/housing/health code violations, complained to the landlord or law enforcement of a violation of Ch. 118A or a criminal statute, organized or joined a tenants' union, instituted or defended a habitability proceeding, filed a fair housing complaint, or is a victim of domestic violence, harassment, sexual assault or stalking (among other listed acts). Tenant gets NRS 118A.390 remedies and a defense to a retaliatory possession action. NRS 118A.510 |
| Utah | It is unlawful for an owner to willfully exclude a tenant from the premises in any manner except by court process (judicial eviction). 'Willful exclusion' means preventing the tenant from entering with intent to deprive the tenant of entry. The only exception is when the tenant has abandoned the premises: the owner may then remove the contents under the abandoned-property procedure and re-rent. The section does not itself list damages for a lockout. Utah Code §§ 78B-6-814, 78B-6-801(11), 78B-6-816 | Utah's landlord-tenant statutes do not specifically address a landlord shutting off utilities to force a renter out. It is unlawful for an owner to willfully keep a tenant out of the premises in any manner except by court process. Separately, owners must maintain electrical systems, plumbing, heating, and hot and cold water, and a renter may use the written notice-of-deficient-condition process (rent abatement and ending the lease, or repair and deduct) if the owner does not correct such a problem. Utah Code §§ 78B-6-814, 57-22-3, 57-22-4(1), 57-22-6 | No statute — Utah has no general law barring landlord retaliation (for example, for complaining about repairs). One limited rule: an owner may not restrict a renter's ability to ask a public safety agency (such as police or fire) for help, and may not penalize or evict a renter for making reasonable requests for that help. Utah Code 57-22-5.1(10); Utah Fit Premises Act (57-22) and Forcible Entry and Detainer (78B-6 Part 8) checked |
| New Mexico | Self-help eviction is banned. Except after abandonment or surrender, an owner may not knowingly exclude or try to remove a resident without a court order by fraud, changing or plugging locks, blocking entrances, removing the resident's belongings, removing or disabling appliances or fixtures (except for legitimate repairs), or any willful act making the unit or belongings inaccessible or uninhabitable. The resident may abate 100% of the rent for each day denied possession, recover a civil penalty of two times the monthly rent, seek restitution of the premises or end the agreement, and recover damages. NMSA 1978, §§ 47-8-36, 47-8-48(C) | No. Except after abandonment or surrender, an owner may not knowingly exclude or try to remove a resident without a court order by interfering with services or utilities, including electricity, gas, hot or cold water, plumbing, heat, or telephone service. The resident may abate 100% of the rent for each day a service is cut for any part of the day, recover a civil penalty of two times the monthly rent, seek restitution of the premises or end the rental agreement, and recover damages. NMSA 1978, §§ 47-8-36, 47-8-48(C) | An owner may not raise rent, reduce services, or bring/threaten an eviction because, within the previous 6 months, the compliant resident complained to a code-enforcement agency, joined/organized a residents' association, exercised UORRA rights (including written repair requests), made a fair housing complaint, won or has pending a lawsuit against the owner about the residency, testified for another resident, or lawfully abated rent. Retaliation is a defense to eviction; owner is liable for 2x monthly rent plus attorney's fees. NMSA 1978, §§ 47-8-39, 47-8-48(C) |
| Colorado | It is unlawful for a landlord to remove or exclude a tenant without court process, including by willfully removing doors, windows or locks other than for repair, unless the tenant agreed, the unit was abandoned (shown by things like returned keys, removal of belongings, notice, or long absence with rent unpaid), or it is required for an illegal drug-lab cleanup. The tenant may sue to stop the violation and must be awarded actual damages plus the greater of three times the monthly rent or $5,000, along with costs and reasonable attorney fees; the court may order possession restored. C.R.S. § 38-12-510 | A landlord may not remove or shut out a tenant without going to court, and unlawful removal includes willfully cutting off utilities. If a landlord willfully and unlawfully causes heat, running water, hot water, electricity, gas or other essential services to be cut off, the tenant may sue to stop it and must be awarded actual damages plus statutory damages of the greater of three times the monthly rent or $5,000, along with costs and reasonable attorney fees; the court may also restore possession. C.R.S. § 38-12-510 | A landlord may not retaliate (raise rent, cut services, end or not renew the lease, bring or threaten eviction, harass, or charge fees) because the tenant made a good-faith complaint about a habitability condition to the landlord, a nonprofit, or a government agency; joined or organized a tenants' association; or used habitability remedies. The tenant need only show that the protected activity was a motivating factor. Remedies: the greater of three months' rent or three times actual damages, plus attorney fees. The tenant may also terminate the lease and raise retaliation as a defense to eviction. C.R.S. § 38-12-509 |
City rules that may add to state law
More Arizona rental law
- Arizona Security Deposit Law
- Arizona Eviction Laws
- Arizona Notice to Vacate Rules
- Landlord Entry Rules in Arizona
- Arizona Repairs & Tenant Remedies
- Arizona Rent Increase & Late Fee Laws
- Breaking a Lease in Arizona
- Squatters' Rights in Arizona
- Arizona Rental Fee Rules
- Arizona Section 8, Records & Right to Counsel
- Arizona Mold, Pests, Heat & AC Rules
- Arizona Privacy, Guests & Animal Rules
- Arizona Landlord Selling the House
- Arizona Subletting, Lease Endings & Tenant Death
- All Arizona landlord-tenant rules
- Free legal help in Arizona
Compare lockouts, utility shutoffs & retaliation in all 50 states and DC →
Arizona Lockouts, Utility Shutoffs & Retaliation FAQ
Can a landlord change the locks without a court order in Arizona?
A landlord may not recover or take possession of a rental by action or otherwise, including by willfully cutting essential services, except after abandonment or surrender or as the landlord-tenant act permits. If a landlord unlawfully removes or excludes the tenant, the tenant may recover possession or end the lease and, either way, recover the greater of two months' periodic rent or twice actual damages. If the lease ends, the landlord must return the security the tenant is owed. (A.R.S. §§ 33-1374, 33-1367)
Can a landlord shut off utilities in Arizona?
A landlord may not take back a rental by willfully cutting off electricity, gas, water or other essential services, and may not terminate utilities provided under the lease except for repairs or as the act allows. If the landlord willfully cuts services, the tenant may recover possession or end the lease and recover the greater of two months' periodic rent or twice actual damages. If the landlord deliberately or negligently fails to supply heat, cooling, water, hot water or essential services, after reasonable notice the tenant may buy the service and deduct the reasonable cost from rent, recover damages for reduced rental value, or get reasonable substitute housing and not pay rent for that period. (A.R.S. §§ 33-1374, 33-1367, 33-1364)
Can a landlord retaliate against a tenant for complaining in Arizona?
A landlord may not raise rent, decrease services, or bring or threaten an eviction after the tenant (1) complained to a building or housing code agency about a health or safety violation, (2) complained to the landlord about a § 33-1324 maintenance violation, (3) organized or joined a tenants' union, or (4) complained to a wage-price stabilization agency. A complaint within 6 months before the alleged retaliation creates a presumption of retaliation. (A.R.S. § 33-1381)
General legal information, not legal advice. Laws change and local rules can differ; check the linked official source or talk to a lawyer about your situation.